Friday, 16 February 2024

Offshore Oil Rig System (Extraction) - Summary Reader Response Draft 3

The article "Application of robotics in offshore oil and gas industry- A review Part ii" by Shukla and Karki (2015), states that with the growing demand for energy and oil, it is important to implement advanced systems to extract oil safely and efficiently. 

The extracting system is a complicated technology for an offshore oil rig plant. This system consists of mainly three parts, the pump, the blowout preventer (BOP) and the pipe rams. With the advancement of technology, pumps can now extract oil 25% faster compared to older oil rigs, this can be seen from data posted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCED), which states that crude oil production more than doubled over the past decade (Grijpink et al., 2020). With pumping at such a high rate of velocity, safety features have also been improved to prevent blowouts. A blowout is an uncontrolled release of oil from a well that can cause the system to fail or explode, a notable case is the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico where a blowout caused massive damage to 11 lives lost and 87 days of continued oil flow into the sea (Pallardy, 2023). The safety features include a blowout preventer (BOP) and pipe arms. The BOP maintains and locks the pressure in, including sheer rams and a choke system in cases of emergency. A sheer ram cuts through the pipeline and seals the well, while the choke system slowly controls the oil flow rate to control the pressure (Shafiee et al., 2020). 

Given the information on the oil rig extracting system (pump, BOP, pipe rams) mentioned, it clearly shows that with the advancement of technology, oil rig extracting systems are safer and more efficient than ever before to meet the demands for energy and oil.

To ensure the efficiency of oil production, China created a plan to increase the extrusion of crude oil without support from companies and countries outside China. According to Zheng et al. (2022), most of China’s crude oil is imported from other countries. Thus, to be more independent and to meet the demands of crude oil production, China has established 5 new Research and Development Centres specialising in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). China uses a ‘4th generation separated-layer water injection technology’ to achieve a better yield. The process uses water injection, which helps by pushing oil into production wells, giving additional energy to the reservoir by aiding its displacement. This technology helped maintain pressure in mature oil fields by filling the cavity via water injection. With the addition of real-time monitoring and controlling, extrusion of oil wells is more efficient. From the statistics given, the natural decline of oil production was reduced by 0.7 percentage points, saving about 326 million RMB (62 million SGD). This is a huge achievement for the research and development sector of the oil industry.

The improvements in safety in the extraction process have come a long way ever since the Deepwater Horizon accident. This unfortunate incident gave insight to engineers and industry personnel about the safety problems in the offshore oil rig industry and finding ways to mitigate those issues. Firstly, poor safety culture, leading up to the Deepwater Horizon accident, audits found that the extraction rig had major maintenance issues, mainly that the BOP was 5 years overdue for re-certification and recommend seizing operations till they were fixed. However, 5 days after the audit, it was back into service without fixing the issues raised. This ultimately caused the accident, killing 11 people and damaging the marine life in the Gulf of Mexico for several decades to come. Secondly, the failure of contingencies, investigations showed that although there were proper steps in place, the problems started to snowball when the contingencies did not work, causing the worst scenario to happen. To address these problems, from a management standpoint, stricter safety guidelines have been reinforced, including thorough checks, fair audits, regular maintenance and adopting higher standards for training. From a technological standpoint, BOPs were redesigned to further improve reliability and safety. An example would be a company called Transocean which improved on the BOP, they created the Kinetic Blowout Stopper (KBOS). The KBOS took 3 years to develop finding the most effective way to prevent blowouts, its main advantage is speed, using pyrotechnics, it takes milliseconds to sheer the affected pipe and seal the well (Rassenfoss, 2020). With the advancement of technology, offshore oil rigs have improved monitoring and control systems that provide real-time data to operators, this allows operators to detect any anomalies, allowing the team to react with an appropriate response. 

In conclusion, there is sufficient evidence showing the improvements in efficiency and safety with the advancement of technology. For efficiency, China has shown great innovations and ideas to produce crude oil independently. With the focus on research and development, China is finding ways to cut costs and constantly improve itself. Extraction of oil has also become safer with proper safety protocol. The safety improvements can also be seen in the equipment being used, with the help of technology, safety features, monitoring and real-time data were added to assist the operators, minimizing the risk for accidents. Ultimately this proves that the industry is heading towards the right direction and by innovating and improving systems, oil can be extruded safely and responsibly.

References 

Grijpink, F., Katsap, N., Verre, F., & Ward, R. (2020, November 6). How tapping connectivity in oil and gas can fuel higher performance. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/how-tapping-connectivity-in-oil-and-gas-can-fuel-higher-performance

Shukla, A., & Karki, H. (2016, January 1). Application of robotics in offshore oil and gas industry— A review Part II. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.09.013

Shafiee, M., Elusakin, T., & Enjema, E. M. (2020, July 1). Subsea blowout preventer (BOP): Design, reliability, testing, deployment, and operation and maintenance challenges. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104170

Skogdalen, J. E., Utne, I. B., & Vinnem, J. E. (2011, October 1). Developing safety indicators for preventing offshore oil and gas deepwater drilling blowouts. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.03.012

Pallardy, R. (2023, December 29). Deepwater Horizon oil spill | Summary, Effects, Cause, Clean Up, & Facts. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/Deepwater-Horizon-oil-spill

Roberts, R., Flin, R., & Cleland, J. (2015, November 1). “Everything was fine”*: An analysis of the drill crew’s situation awareness on Deepwater Horizon. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.08.008

Rassenfoss, S. (2020, June 30). Macondo Changed BOPs, but There Is a Limit. JPT. https://jpt.spe.org/macondo-changed-bops-there-limit

Zheng, X., Shi, J., Cao, G., Yang, N., Cui, M., Jia, D., & Liu, H. (2022, June 1). Progress and prospects of oil and gas production engineering technology in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1876-3804(22)60054-5

No comments:

Post a Comment

Module/Project Learning

Module learning:  At the start of the trimester, I set two goals for myself, to improve on my staff work writing and improving my communicat...